Mono
Lake Microbial Observatory Progress Report
Or:
What you can see in this figure (if you know where to look!)
This diagram shows the distribution of physical and
biological properties at a location near the deepest part of the lake, southeast
of Paoha Island, on May 17, 2000. The
data in the panel on the left were collected by lowering an instrument package
that records, at 0.1 sec. intervals, water temperature (shown in black); light
intensity (shown in red); chlorophyll fluorescence, a measure of the biomass of
single-celled green plants living in the water (shown in green); and the depth
below the lake surface at which the other measurements were taken.
The data in the panel on the right were generated by analyzing samples of
water collected at the depths indicated by the orange arrows.
Let’s focus on the left half of the figure first, the side that
describes the physical structure of the lake at the time the samples were
collected.
Light intensity decreased rapidly due to light absorption
by the relatively high concentrations of plant biomass present in the lake’s
surface waters at this time. Light
intensity decreased to values approaching 0 by a depth of 12 m, (line offset to
keep it from coinciding with the depth axis).
Most plants cannot photosynthesize at light levels below about 10 units,
but one of the dominant plants in Mono Lake is a tiny cell that thrives at light
intensities near 1 unit. This
plant, named Picocystis by a scientist (Dr. Ralph Lewin) at the Scripps
Institute of Oceanography (we call it Mickey Mouse because of its trilobate
structure – it looks like Mickey Mouse’s silhouette when you look at it with
a microscope), is responsible for the jump in plant biomass indicated by the
increase in chlorophyll fluorescence (green line) at a depth of 15 m.
This depth is also where oxygen disappears from the
lake’s water (the zone labeled “OXYCLINE” in the figure) due to a
combination of restricted replenishment from oxygenated surface waters in
contact with the atmosphere and oxygen consumption by the populations of
bacteria living in the lake. The
change of water temperature (black line) with depth exerts a strong influence on
the replenishment process. Where
temperature changes little with depth (upper 12 m), replenishment is easy –
the wind blowing over the lake’s surface is enough to stir or mix oxygenated
water at the lake’s surface into the deeper layers of the lake.
But where the temperature decreases rapidly with depth – the
thermocline – it more difficult to stir shallower water into deeper water.
The thermocline acts as a barrier to the penetration of oxygen into the
deeper layers of the lake, thus the thermocline and the oxycline tend to
coincide. There was no oxygen present (termed “anoxic;” from “an” = no
and “oxic” = oxygen, literally: “no oxygen”) at all depths below 16 m
when we sampled in May.
Mickey Mouse uses anoxia in Mono Lake to escape being eaten
by brine shrimp. In addition to
being able to photosynthesize at very low light levels, it is also able to
tolerate high concentrations of toxic substances like sulfide that accumulate in
the near-bottom waters of the lake. These
substances diffuse up through the thermocline, repelling or possibly even
poisoning brine shrimp living in the surface layer of the lake.
That is one of the main reasons that Mickey Mouse increases to such
abundance in the oxycline – it is not grazed by the Mono Lake equivalent of
range cattle, the brine shrimp. The
oxycline and the substances diffusing up through it act kind of like a fence to
exclude the brine shrimp.
Deeper in the lake, at a depth of about 22 m, lies the
chemocline. This is the zone where
the amount of salt dissolved in Mono Lake water increases rapidly with depth.
In the middle of the lake away from the creeks, the salt content of the
water is relatively constant with depth, both above and below the chemocline.
The chemocline has an effect similar to that of the thermocline on mixing
between two layers of the lake – it acts as a barrier to mixing and exchange
of water. This shows in the figure
in both the temperature line and in the chlorophyll fluorescence line as
follows. Below the chemocline,
water temperature actually increases a degree or two.
This is because the water below the chemocline has been trapped there
since 1995 and is gradually being warmed from below by heat flowing up through
the lake bottom from deeper in the Earth. The
higher salt content of this water increases its density and keeps it from
floating up off the bottom as it warms and becomes less dense.
The cold water between the chemocline and the oxy- or thermocline is a
kind of historical artifact – it cooled to that temperature during the coldest
part of last winter (Feb 2000) when the surface of the lake was so cold that
there was no thermocline and surface water was mixed all the way down to the
chemocline. Mixing was stopped at
the chemocline by the increased salt content of the water.
Since then, the sun has warmed the surface of the lake by approximately 6
degrees, leaving the relict cold winter water trapped between the chemocline and
the ever-intensifying thermocline.
By the way, in February when surface water was mixing all
of the way down to the chemocline, there was oxygen throughout the whole layer
above the chemocline. This
oxygenated water did not penetrate the chemocline, so Mono Lake remained anoxic
below the chemocline with the result that during the middle of the winter the
oxycline and the chemocline coincided, just as the oxycline and the thermocline
coincided when we sampled in May. What
happened to the oxygen that was trapped in the layer between the chemocline and
the thermocline? It was used up by
oxygen-respiring bacteria and by spontaneous oxidation of chemicals like sulfide
that diffused across the chemocline.
The story is similar for the chlorophyll fluorescence
profile: the maximum in chlorophyll
fluorescence at 24 m is the remnant of a much larger biomass peak that had
accumulated in the layer between the thermocline and the chemocline as a result
of the growth of Mickey Mouse (primarily) during the summer of 1999!
The rest of this biomass was distributed throughout the lake by winter
mixing, seeding the lake with Mickey Mouse plants in time for the spring.
We are not really sure what is responsible for the high fluorescence of
the water below the chemocline. It
appears to be caused by intact Mickey Mouse cells that have slowly rained down
from above, either singly or as part of brine shrimp excrement (the Mono Lake
equivalent of the cow patty). But
how these cells are surviving in the environmental conditions below the
chemocline is a mystery yet to be solved.
Let us now turn our attention to the right half of the
figure. The horizontal streaks
(they’re called lanes in the molecular biology literature) are a series of
genetic fingerprints of the bacteria that were in the sample of water collected
at the depth indicated by the orange arrow.
These fingerprints were generated using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
and a technique called denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).
Within each lane are darker vertical bands.
Each band, more or less, contains the DNA from a particular region of the
gene for the small subunit of the ribosome from a particular type of bacteria
that was present in that sample. If
you follow the bands from lane to lane, you will see that they are typically
found in a number of adjacent lanes, indicating that they were present
throughout the depth range covered by that group of samples.
The blue arrows superimposed on the image are to show you examples of
places where bands do not continue between adjacent lanes.
These are places where there is a shift in the composition of the
microbial ecosystem in Mono Lake. If
you look at the figure for a while, you will see that most shifts coincide with
the chemocline and the oxycline. This
means that you would find more or less the same bacteria in all the samples you
collected above the oxycline, or between the oxycline and the chemocline, or
below the chemocline. A very dark
band in the middle of the lanes that continues across all of the lanes, from the
top to the bottom of the figure, is from the chloroplast of our friend, Mickey
Mouse. This band has been indicated
in the middle of the panel by pointer arrows from its proper name, Picocystis.
This technique (PCR/DGGE) gives us a tantalizing look at
the distribution of bacteria in the lake. With
it we can examine vertical and horizontal distributions and how this changes
seasonally. But it won’t really
give us the key information we are after in the Microbial Observatory:
who are these bacteria and what are they doing?
To find this out we have to go back to the lab (that’s where we are
now) and do more analyses. We can
use the bands in the DGGE lanes to get a sort of abbreviated name for the
bacterium that donated DNA for the analysis; we can then compare this to a sort
of telephone book of full names created by another approach to get a full name
and, if we’re lucky and the organism has been studied before, a sort of resume
of what it does for a living. If
the bacterium, like Picocystis, has never been discovered before (most of
them haven’t), then we also have to figure out what it does for a living so we
can understand its role in the ecology and geochemistry of Mono Lake.
We are actively working on both of these fronts, and on other aspects of
the microbiology and geochemistry of Mono Lake. We will report on our progress with periodic updates of this
web page and with material posted on the SNARL web page.
Tim Hollibaugh
2 November 2000